Tues 18Feb2020
Hey Guys hard tracking City St.PAUL,Perks,Payments,Published.
Thankful every day when i wake that i can still see out of R Eye Going Blind is a Bitch, the Stress would kill most persons HOWEVER by Grace of God, Gps,Graphics, etcl
Trumpy MY MAN can fight the DFL, I cannot
years ago Roy Spannus help Sharon
stayed at his Apt on Grand ave, near Dale next to Halfway House for Abused Women,
Roy Brother of MN
Roy Spannus Auther of Misplaced Trust - Google SearchAG Warran Spannus now both deceased.
Roy Spannus Auther of Misplaced Trust - Google SearchAG Warran Spannus now both deceased.
Lawyer also deceased MN Injustice, Sharon Scarrella and Frank are Still alive
SIMPLE ISSUES;
Fred Great Article on
COUNT I City St.Paul,Sanctuary,
Trump Drops the Hammer on Sanctuary Cities–Sends in Elite Forces – Life And Liberty News
Trump Drops the Hammer on Sanctuary Cities–Sends in Elite Forces – Life And Liberty News
COUNT II Anti Trust City Employees have personal cars,ins,maintenance paid by City ?
362923310054 MELVIN W CARTER III428 AURORA AVE Vacant
 | 302922230181 | MELVIN CARTER III |
|---|
h)
COUNT III AND IV
QUESTIONS
How does DSI Inspectors by info and belief drive their own personal cars to do their job of Excessive INSPECTIONS, then heard by Marcia Mormond, how does MM GET TO work and if by her Car, is paid for by City out of Budget,
Techinally Legal/Illegal PERK, if so how Taxed with IRS.
HOW MANY Sober Houses,CO AND Fire CO, BILLINGS. was informed that a Dr. Murphy had purchased many old duplexs for this Sober,Addict,Sex Predators, on East Side and if so ARE HEARD BY MARCIA MORMOND Legislative Hearing Officer, to CERTIFY BY AMY BREDMOEN Ward 5 TO PROPERTY TAX STATEMENTS.
Can;t find Home address of Chris Samuels Auditor
HF3010(Lesc
Government entity required to obtain search warrants before accessing electronic communication information.
Government entity required to obtain search warrants before accessing electronic communication information.
HF3012(Lesch)
Electronic location tracking warrant information reporting enabled.
Electronic location tracking warrant information reporting enabled.
brought following the investigation of former special counsel Robert Mueller and his team.
Examples: Barr assigned Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady to serve as the intake portal for information funneled to the United States from sources in Ukraine, including information about Biden and his son Hunter Biden gathered by Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani; U.S. Attorney John Durham in Connecticut has been working since last year to review the U.S. Russia probe that began when Trump was a candidate up until the time of his inauguration; U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen in Missouri is tasked with reviewing the criminal case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, reportedly coordinating with the lead federal prosecutor in the case, Brandon Van Grack. Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his communications with a Russian ambassador (Fox News).
Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, now a Republican Senate candidate in Alabama, in 2018 assigned U.S. Attorney John Huber in Utah to fully examine the concerns of GOP lawmakers about the government’s Russia probe (The Associated Press).
Twin Cities housing: The 'flaming hoops' separating builders and cities - StarTribune.com
This is an announcement e-mail message generated by Court action through the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
We have recently discovered that some documents filed by parties with redactions have not been properly redacted. It appears that some parties and counsel have not always been using the redaction tools in Adobe, but have been doing the redactions in Word by using a solid rectangular box to cover up the redacted material. Although this covers up the information, it does not remove the information to be redacted. A member of the press discovered this and was able to remove the solid box and uncover the redacted information.
Effective immediately, the Court has restricted access to all documents (dating from 2015-present) where the docket text indicates a redacted document was filed. Court staff will manually review these filings and release the restriction as appropriate and as soon as we verify that the documents were redacted correctly. If you require immediate access to a document that is now restricted, please call the CM/ECF Help Desk at 612-664-5155 or email at ecfhelpdesk@mnd.uscourts.gov. The document will be reviewed for compliance and corrected if necessary and released immediately thereafter.
The Court does not endorse a specific redaction tool. I have linked to instructions on how to flatten/sanitize a document utilizing Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 as a reference only. This will be incorporated into CM/ECF training going forward.
Effective immediately, the Court will mark newly filed and improperly redacted documents as filed in error and request they be re-filed using the appropriate redaction methods.
e city of Minnetonka looked at Bloomington’s example and concluded the answer was to establish a half-acre minimum lot size. When their sewage began leeching into Lake Minnetonka, it too was required to establish municipal utilities, except that assessments were twice as large because each mile of sewer line served only half as many homes.
Debacles such as these led to the creation of the regional wastewater treatment system now operated by the Metropolitan Council and, ultimately, to the creation of the Met Council itself.
We have recently discovered that some documents filed by parties with redactions have not been properly redacted. It appears that some parties and counsel have not always been using the redaction tools in Adobe, but have been doing the redactions in Word by using a solid rectangular box to cover up the redacted material. Although this covers up the information, it does not remove the information to be redacted. A member of the press discovered this and was able to remove the solid box and uncover the redacted information.
Effective immediately, the Court has restricted access to all documents (dating from 2015-present) where the docket text indicates a redacted document was filed. Court staff will manually review these filings and release the restriction as appropriate and as soon as we verify that the documents were redacted correctly. If you require immediate access to a document that is now restricted, please call the CM/ECF Help Desk at 612-664-5155 or email at ecfhelpdesk@mnd.uscourts.gov. The document will be reviewed for compliance and corrected if necessary and released immediately thereafter.
The Court does not endorse a specific redaction tool. I have linked to instructions on how to flatten/sanitize a document utilizing Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 as a reference only. This will be incorporated into CM/ECF training going forward.
Effective immediately, the Court will mark newly filed and improperly redacted documents as filed in error and request they be re-filed using the appropriate redaction methods.
No comments:
Post a Comment